This latest iteration has a lot more Schmid accompanied by a more limited collection of works by the usual suspects. There are 50 Schmid’s, mostly quick portraits, that makes for a fine contrast with the
Willem DeKooning Drawing exhibition that just closed at the Art Institute of Chicago. Beyond the contours of his carefully modeled faces, Schmid is something of an Abstract Expressionist. He loves the freedom of painting without representation - and creating the feeling of a fresh, fleeting moment.
But, of course, Schmid had other fish to fry. DeKooning depicted people with an adolescent boys naughty irreverence. Schmid shared the more positive aspects of character that actually make our human world liveable: intellect, gentleness, idealism, strength, compassion, etc.
So then he might also be compared with some old masters, as in the example shown below.
El Greco, portrait of
Fray Hortensio Felix Paravicino, 1609
Very few historic portraits are as personal and intense as the above. Similar to Schmid’s subjects, Fray Hortensio was a personal friend of the artist who was also a creative person - a firey preacher and poet.
This piece traveled to Chicago in 2020 and it drove me as crazy as the man depicted. His personality filled the room - and it’s the twisting dynamic of the entire painting that makes that happen.
Schmid’s brushstrokes carry the personality of his admirable and/or beloved subjects out onto the surrounding canvas, but that’s as far as it goes. These sketchy pieces are clever, virtuosic, and charming. And so far as I can tell, they accurately express not just how these people look, but also what they are about. Compared with El Greco’s piece, they feel insubstantial, but so does our modern world compared with that great age of faith - (though I’m quite glad that religious authority is no longer a casus belli - except among opportunistic politicians and radical true believers.)
Boldini. Portrait of Whistler.1897
Perhaps this more recent painting from a more secular age is a better example. Once again, the artist is portraying a very creative friend. It came to Chicago in the Sargent- Guilded Age show at the Art Institute in 2018. The entire canvas produces a striking effect, as does the minutiae of brush strokes. It feels spontaneous- but not slap dash. And though it presents a man of liveliness, wit, and sophistication - a darker, more complex, aggressive, egocentric side is there as well.
If Schmid ever took his portraits this far, they've yet to come to our gallery. Mostly he was content with leaving a quick, positive impression. A few more developed paintings , depicting Nancy, can be found online:
Hopefully RichardSchmid.com will eventually present a more complete catalog raisonne.
The Poet
An intense young Rose
It somehow feels right that Grace Lai has been triangulated. She loved to sketch high rise building projects under construction.
If only this piece were in our permanent collection.
Way more serious than all the others.
A portrait of the beloved.
Really captures the joy of flowing water - and our living planet.
**********
Schmid was articulate and passionate in his teaching - as well as a prolific writer.
He taught specific techniques some of which his former students, especially Nancy, carry on.
He also advocated painting what you saw and envisioning the final piece at the very beginning of the process - which I think works better on small alla prima landscapes and florals.
But otherwise the canvas usually depicts a narrative more important than itself.
Graphic power is weak and color is nothing more than accurate or appropriate. In defiance of a mainstream artworld that rejected it, that’s where naturalistic figurative art went in the postwar era - and you can see it in many organizations like the Oil Painters of America, the National Sculpture Society, the Portrait Painters of America, etc. - as well as among the former students shown in the adjacent gallery.
If a painting has a recognizable narrative, it’s rare for visuality to be as compelling - but that’s what I really want to see - and a visually centered aesthetic appears to be the foundation of the encyclopedic art museums that were established over a hundred years ago.
Schmid strongly denied he was an illustrator. That’s what I would call it - but that’s hardly a bad thing if pleasing the most people is important (Thomas Kinkaide) or achieving iconic status in art museums (Andy Warhol).
Nancy Guzik
This was the piece I liked most in the small gallery hung with works of former students. A real delight that was way underpriced. Congratulations to whoever bought it.
Nancy Guzik
This piece looks less exciting. As with Schmid, a plethora of charming detail has been organized in a less than charming way.
Clayton Beck
I usually like the female nudes these artists paint, but this was the only one in this year’s show, and Clayton also showed it in 2018. Apparently he doesn’t make these much any more.
*******
So many of the other pieces in this room felt morbid to me. The dying old man painted by Rose; the ghostly young women by Sue and Daniel, the front and center staring faces by Scott.
Scott Burdick
Scott Burdick
Scott Burdick
Strange and spooky. A very strong presence.
Somewhere in between a religious icon and a concert poster from the sixties. Scott has traveled a long way from the upbeat naturalism of Schmid.
Dan Gerhartz
Dan Gerhartz
Both of these young women feel like ghosts
Romel de la Torre
What could be more cheerful than an open air market, but this one feels dark and claustrophobic.
Rose Frantzen, study for Last Light
Last Light, Portrait Society of America , Grand Prize 2026
Weird - but also as ordinary as apple pie. Doesn’t everybody eventually see their last light?
Rose has also traveled a long way from her mentor.

Rose Frantzen, “The impossibility of feeling worthy in a universe of infinite beauty”
Might make more sense to me if it felt more beautiful than strange and disturbing.
(But then, I feel the same way about the graphics of William Blake,
and the paintings by her fellow Midwesterner, Thomas Hart Benton)
Reminds me of that mile long , epic visionary painting by Raqib Shaw now at the Art Institute. So meticulously rendered, and so unpleasant.
Susan Lyon
Sue brought two charcoal drawings to the show, but I could not photograph them through the reflections on the glass. So I pulled this one off her website. All three feel sepulchral. The above could be etched on a tombstone.
******
This show follows hard upon the "Emerging Artists" show in September. Hopefully we will see many more ambitiously curated shows in the future. Stuart is talking about a national small picture show, and I hope it will happen.